April 29, 2004

 

To:       RTID Executive Committee Members

Fr:       Kjristine Lund, Executive Director

Re:       RTID Plan Report

 

A.  Highlights of the Statutory requirements for an RTID plan from RCW 36.120

 

The Executive Committee shall formulate a regional transportation investment plan subject to approval by the full Planning Committee. The plan to be submitted to the voters must propose the creation of the regional transportation investment RTID district (RTID) and it must include specific projects for construction that will improve mobility within each county.

 

The plan must include identification of proposed revenue sources as well as a financial plan.  The Plan submitted to the voters must provide cost estimates for each project, including reasonable contingency costs.

 

The Planning Committee may consider these factors in formulating its plan:

 

§         Land use planning criteria

§         Input of Cities

§         Input of RTPO

 

The Planning Committee shall consider the following criteria for selecting transportation projects to improve corridor performance:

 

§         Reduce level of congestion and improve safety

§         Improve travel time

§         Improve air quality

§         Increase in daily and peak period person and vehicle trip capacity

§         Reduction in person and vehicle delay

§         Improved freight mobility

§         Cost-effectiveness

 

The Planning Committee shall conduct public meetings to assure active participation in development of the plan.  Once adopted by the Planning Committee, the plan must be forwarded to the participating county legislative authorities to initiate the election process.

 

At the option of the Planning Committee, and with explicit approval of the Regional Transit Authority (referred to generically as RTA, but known in the Puget Sound region as Sound Transit), the participating counties may choose to impose any remaining high capacity transportation (HCT) taxes that have not otherwise been used by the Sound Transit RTA and submit to the voters a “common” ballot measure that creates the district, approves the regional transportation investment plan, implements the taxes, and implements any remaining HCT within the boundaries of the RTID.

 

Collection and expenditure of any HCT taxes implemented under this section must be determined by agreement between the participating counties or district and the RTA electing to submit HCT taxes to the voters.

 

B.     Fund sources recommended by Executive Committee on March 12, 2004

 

The amounts displayed below represent the estimated funding level, including bond proceeds available from revenue generated by the proposed tax sources.  Individual funding levels for each funding source assumes state bonding.  Funding levels vary depending on the timing and cash flow associated with the project implementation schedule.

 

Tax (in billions)

Over 15 years

District wide

King

Pierce

Snohomish

0.2% roads sales tax

3.84.0

2.4

0.89

0.7

$75 license fee

3.78

1.9

1.01

0.8

Local option gas tax at 2.8 cents

1.12

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.3% MVET

1.98

1.20

0.4

0.3

0.1% RTA tax transfer

1.92.0

1.2

0.45

0.3

Total RevenueFunding

(with state bonding)

12.48

7.31

2.93.2

2.34

 

 

 

Sound Transit will provide a list of proposed investments by May 27, 2004, should they vote to proceed with a common ballot.  For purposes of moving forward with the draft plan, the Sound Transit investments are place-holders in this plan for Sound Move eligible projects.

 

C.    Proposed Project Investments based on March 12 Revenue Mix

 

PIERCE COUNTY

 

Pierce County’s proposed Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) project list has two primary goals:

 

 

The first goal is illustrated by major RTID investments on I-5 and SR 167, two of Pierce County’s principal transportation corridors.  Significant investments are proposed for both highways.

 

·        Interstate 5 – The state transportation package provides for adding HOV lanes to I-5 in two key locations.  Improvements will be made in the vicinity of the I-5/SR 16 Interchange and also between the Port of Tacoma Interchange and the Pierce/King County line.  This does, however, leave two major gaps in the HOV system between SR 16 and the county line.  RTID proposes to fill in those missing pierces. 

 

The first project provides for a realignment of I-5 and a new interchange between I-5 and SR 16 with freeway to freeway HOV connections.  This project also improves the Nalley-Valley Viaduct portion of SR 16 connecting to the portion of SR 16 that has been widened by the state.

 

The second project fills in the gap between Pacific Ave. and the Port of Tacoma Interchange.  It includes the reconstruction of all the interchanges within these project limits. 

 

Once these two RTID projects and the state funded projects are completed, Pierce County will have continuous HOV lanes on I-5 from the county line to SR 16 and on SR 16 from I-5 to Gig Harbor.

 

·        SR 167 Extension – This project has long been one of Pierce County’s highest priorities.  It is both a congestion relief project and a major fright mobility project.  The improvement is proposed in two phases.  The first connects the Port of Tacoma to I-5 with a new four lane connection including a new major interchange with I-5.  The second phase provides a new four lane freeway from I-5 to Puyallup. 

 

§         Other important improvements in Pierce County include construction of the Cross Base Highway which will connect I-5 with the central portion of Pierce County, capacity improvements to SR 162 from SR 167 south to Orting, providing capacity improvements on the Key Peninsula by realigning and widening SR 302, adding HOV lanes to the existing north-south portion of SR 167 between Sumner and Auburn, and making improvements to local roadways in the South Hill area and in the Frederickson vicinity.

 

 

PIERCE COUNTY PROJECTS

RTID COST

I-5 Improvements

$432.7M

SR 167 Improvements

$1,650.7M

Other State Highways

$603.6M

Other Local Roads

$60.7M

Subtotal

2,747.7M

Sound Transit Projects

100 to 450M

Total Investment Level

Up to $2,800M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KING COUNTY

 

King County’s proposed Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) project list focuses on major interstate and state highway corridors.  Major investments are proposed in the following five corridors.

 

Alaskan Way Viaduct (SR 99) & Seawall Project – This project will construct a new six-lane facility between Holgate Street and the Battery Street Tunnel to replace the existing seismically-vulnerable structure.   The new facility will add expanded roadway shoulders and wider lanes.  The RTID investment will fund the most critical southern phase of the project from Holgate Street to King Street, including ground improvements, and make fire and life safety improvements to the Battery Street Tunnel.  Additional state, federal, and local funding will be required to complete the project.

 

SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project -- This project's cost estimate assumes replacing the existing bridge with a new 6-lane facility (2 general-purpose lanes and 1 HOV lane in each direction).  The RTID investment will replace the seismic and storm-vulnerable Evergreen Point Floating Bridge and its approaches.  The new bridge will also add expanded roadway shoulders and bicycle/ pedestrian lanes.  Additional state funding (to be determined) will complete the HOV lanes between Montlake Boulevard and the vicinity of Bellevue Way.

 

I-405 Congestion Relief and Transit Projects – These projects relieve congestion on the I-405 corridor by adding capacity, improving safety, and investing in transit.  The project improves 22 miles of interstate 405 between Tukwila and Bothell.  Roadway improvements include two lanes added in each direction from downtown Bellevue south to SR 167 in Renton and related interchange improvements.   One lane will be added each direction from the I-405/SR 167 interchange south on SR 167 to 180th Street and west to I-5.   One lane will also be added north from the SR 520 in Bellevue to SR 522 in Bothell.   The project will include transit in-line stations, HOV direct access ramps, park-and-ride lot expansion, and the purchase of both vanpools and buses.  In addition, bike trails and pedestrian connections will be built, and significant stream and environmental enhancements will be made.  Project description above describes $2.5M RTID investment plus $500M State-Nickel plus $200M federal dollars.

 

 

I-5/ SR 509 Freight Mobility and Congestion Relief Project – This project will help relieve I-5 congestion and help freight move in south King County by completing SR 509 as a six-lane freeway with HOV lanes between Interstate 5 and S. 188th Street in SeaTac.  This project will also construct 6 miles of improvements on Interstate 5 from S. 320th in Federal Way to South 200th and connects SeaTac International Airport's South Access Expressway to SR 509 and Interstate 5.  Dramatic water quality improvements will occur in the Des Moines Creek Basin.  The RTID investment coupled with state funding from the nickel package completes this project.

 

SR 167 Valley Freeway Freight Mobility and Congestion Relief Projects -- This project addresses congestion on SR 167 between S 180th St in Renton and the vicinity of the King/Pierce County line.  The RTID investment completes HOV

lanes from Auburn to the county line (see matching HOV improvements in Pierce County) and addresses congestion hotspots in Kent and Auburn. 

 

The I-5/SR 18 “Triangle” Interchange will be improved by adding two freeway to freeway ramp connections and a west-side frontage road directly connecting I-5 to SR 161.  In Shoreline and north Seattle, improvements will be made to SR 99 that will help facilitate transit and pedestrian travel.

 

KING COUNTY PROJECTS

RTID COST

Alaskan Way Viaduct

$1,000M

SR 520 Corridor*

$1,000M

I-405 Corridor*

$1,900M

I-405/167 Interchange

$820 M

SR 509/I-5 Investments

$900M

SR 167 Corridor

$500M

I-5/SR 18 Interchange

$100M

SR 518

$35M

Non-HSS Projects

$20M

Subtotal

$6,275M

Light Rail

$875M

SR 99 North Corridor

$80M

SR 522 Transit Investments

$60 M

TOTAL

Up to $7,290M

*assumes up to $180M in eligible Sound Transit investments in corridor

 

Snohomish County

 

Snohomish County’s proposed Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) project list focuses the majority of the funds on major state highway corridors while still making significant investments in local roads and in transit related improvements.  Major state highway corridors that will be improved with RTID revenues include:

 

Interstate 5 – The I-5 corridor is the beneficiary of a major HOV widening project from the state transportation package (“nickel projects”) passed by the 2003 state legislature.  The RTID projects in the I-5 corridor compliment the HOV widening by improving seven interchanges, including the 41st Street Interchange in Everett.  The other six interchange improvement projects stretch from Lynnwood to Arlington.

 

SR 9 – Here, proposed RTID investments also compliment those from the 2003 state transportation package.  The state investment will widen SR 9 from SR 522 to 176th Street SE.  The RTID investment will continue the five lane widening from 176th Street SE north to SR 92.  Also, between SR 92 and SR 530 in Arlington, improvements at major intersections are proposed.

 

US 2 – The US 2 Trestle is a choke point between residential areas to the east and employment centers to the west of the Snohomish River.  The RTID proposal is to add one eastbound lane to the US 2 Trestle and to provide interchange improvements at I-5 and at SR 204.

 

Additionally, a major improvement is proposed in the Sultan vicinity that will widen US 2 to five lanes, provide bicycle lanes, and replace two aging bridges.

 

SR 522 – This is another proposed RTID investment that directly compliments a major widening project funded by the state.  Fairly recently, the state completed widening of SR 522 east to Paradise Lake Road.  The state transportation package includes a major widening project on SR 522 between the Snohomish River and US 2.  This leaves a gap in the corridor improvements between Paradise Lake Road and the Snohomish River.  RTID proposes to fill that gap creating a four lane median divided highway from Bothell to Monroe.

 

 

 

Other State Highway Improvements – Improvements are proposed on several other state highways including SR 92 (Granite Falls Bypass and other intersection improvements), SR 99, SR 524, SR 531 and SR 532.

 

Local Roadway Improvements – Snohomish County proposes improvement to a number of local roads.  These improvements are needed to compliment the proposed investments on the major state highways.

 

Transit Related Improvements – Snohomish County is directing their MVET generated revenue towards specific projects that improve transit service and operations.  Several park and ride lots are proposed, a major contribution to the Edmonds Multimodal Terminal and a minor investment in the Mukilteo Multimodal Terminal are included, bus and van purchases are on the list, and several other transit related improvements are proposed in Snohomish County.

 

 

SNOHOMISH COUNTY PROJECTS

RTID COST

I-5 Improvements

$226.7M

SR 9 Improvements

$491.3M

US 2 Improvements

$399.3M

SR 522 Improvements

$94.6M

Other State Highways

$240.6M

Local Roadways

$258.9M

Transit Related

$327.7M

Subtotal

$2,039.1M

Sound Transit

$100-300M

Total Investment level

Up to $2,200M

 

D.    Sound Transit common ballot revenue sources and uses

 

Under the “common ballot”, Sound Transit, the RTA, will decide the HCT projects they choose to fund with unused RTA taxing authority. When the Sound Transit board identifies the specific Phase I, Sound Move projects they wish to accelerate using funds from a “Common Ballot”, staff can develop a financial plan that matches expenditures with the best fit for a combination of cash and bonds.  This will need to occur between May 27 Sound transit Board action and the Final Plan adoption by the Planning Committee.

 

 

Executive Board members asked for cost estimates for the Sound Transit investments.  These are not available at this time.  These costs are anticipated by the date of the Sound Transit Board action on May 20.

 

The Executive Board members also asked if Sound Transit would fund HOV projects with RTA funds.  These are eligible projects but would require a Sound Transit board policy change.

 

Examples of Alternatives for Financing RTA HCT Projects

 

Tax (in billions)

Over 15 years

District wide

King

Pierce

Snohomish

0.1% RTA tax transfer, fully bonded.

1.902.0

1.20

0.405

0.30

 

0.1% RTA, cash expenditures

1.38

0.89

0.26

0.22

0.08%, fully bonded

1.4360

0.8892

0.31040

0.241

Eligible Expenditure

1.40

1.10+

up to 0.15

up to 0.15

 

E.     Draft plan process of public review, financial plan, and cost review

 

Following adoption of a draft plan on April 29, staff will complete detailed scopes, cost reviews, and a financial plan.

 

From May 1 – May 28, the draft plan will be presented to the County Councils of Pierce, King, and Snohomish Countiesy for information and discussion.  In addition, the draft plan will be reviewed with civic organizations and opinion leaders.

 

The Sound Transit Board is scheduled to discuss a common ballot on May 20 and to take action on May 27, 2004.

 

The Executive Committee will meet on June 10, or before, to adopt a final plan, incorporating feedback from the public review process. 

 

 

The Planning Committee would meet on June 17 to adopt the final plan, should the Executive Committee decide to move forward for the November 2004 election.