RTID
Regional Transportation
Investment District

A Puget Sound
Investment in Transportation

Home

King County Pierce County Snohomish County

 

  

 

How is the Investment Plan Developed?

The RTID Planning Committee empowered the Executive Board to develop an Investment Plan.  Following development of the Investment Plan, the Planning Committee approves the plan and forward it to each of the Counties.  The County Councils vote to place the Investment Plan on the ballot or to "opt out" of the RTID.  This flow chart details the Investment Plan development and approval process.

How are project chosen?

The Executive Board began discussion on a list of projects proposed by the County Executives of King, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties.  From this start the Executive Board members (and alternates) from each county have worked with their continuants, local jurisdictions, and transportation agencies to refine the list and to balance project expenditures with potential funding levels.

Following adoption of a Draft Investment Plan, the RTID will conduct public outreach meetings to solicit comments on the funding types, levels, and projects proposed in the draft plan.  Each county will schedule outreach meetings on the Draft Investment Plan:

  • King County

  • Pierce County

  • Snohomish County

What type of projects can be funded by the RTID?

The state legislation (ESSB 6140) that permits the formation of the RTID directs what type of project are eligible for funding the the RTID.  Section 102(8) project type limitations proposed projects to:

1.   Projects that improve a Highway of Statewide Significance (HSS) 

  1. Adding lane(s) to an existing HSS highway.

  2. Repairs or replaces an HSS highway that was damaged by a declared emergency before January 1, 2002.

2.   Projects that improve a HSS highway, new extension, including associated multi-modal improvements such as:

  1. Highway or roadway approaches to an HSS highway,

  2. High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes,

  3. Flyover ramps,

  4. Park & Ride lots,

  5. Bus pullouts,

  6. Vans for vanpools,

  7. Busses; and

  8. Signalization, ramp metering, and other transportation system management improvements.

3.   Projects on city streets, county roads, and Non-HSS highways.  Improvements to all or portions of the existing roadway or creation of a new highway the intersections with an HSS highway provided:

  1. The project is part of a plan add capacity to highway;

  2. The Secretary of Transportation determines that the project would better relieve traffic congestion than investing the same money to adding capacity to a HSS highway. Analysis process for Secretary's determination on Non-HSS projects.

  3. 1/3 of the project cost is provided by a local entity; and

  4. The type of project can be no more than 10% or up a maximum of $1 billion of the RTID Plan expenditures.

What is a Highway of Statewide Significance?

The Revised Code of Washington (RCW) sets minimal criteria for HSS designation: 

“This statewide system shall include at a minimum interstate highways and other statewide principal arterials that are needed to connect major communities across the state and support the state’s economy.”  

The Washington State Transportation Commission expanded the criteria, an HSS roadway must also be:

  • A State Highway;

  • A Principal Arterial that is part of the National Highway System (NHS);

  • Rural routes serving statewide travel; and/or

  • Urban routes that are:

  • Statewide travel links to Rural HSS,

  • Connections to Principal Arterial Ferry Routes,

  • Long haul freight links - FGTS Class T1 and T2, and

  • Connections to ports - FGTS Class T1 and T2.

 

Designation of a route as HSS means:

  • Higher priority for improvement funding;

  • State has authority for setting level-of-service (LOS);

  • Highway segment is exempt from local transportation concurrency requirements;

  • Identified as an essential public facility;

  • Consideration for primary funding by a the RTID. 

The Washington State Legislature adopted the Commission proposed list of Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) on April 14, 1999.  The list was amended by the Legislature’s “Regionalism Bill” in 2002 to include the portion of SR 509 to be constructed between SR 518 and Interstate 5.  Of the 7,063 miles of state highway, 3,532 miles (50%) are designated HSS.  

The State Legislature adopted the Commission's proposed list of HSS on April 14, 1999.  The list was amended by the Legislature’s “Regionalism Bill” in 2002 to include the portion of SR 509 to be constructed between SR 518 and Interstate 5.  Of the 7,063 miles of state highway, 3,532 miles (50%) are designated HSS.  The bill also reinforces the delineation of HSS and Non-HSS routes by specifically identified three Non-HSS highways as “Highways of Regional Significance”.  

  • SR 9 (between SR 522 and SR 531),

  • SR 524 (between I-5 and SR 522), and

  • SR 704 (Cross-Base Highway, between I-5 and SR 7).

 

       Back to Top
All Rights Reserved RTID - Last Updated
May 10, 2004